by Yosra Akasha

The humanitarian crisis in East Africa is portrayed largely as a lack of food but ongoing political dimensions must be acknowledged for progress to be made

In recent years drought has become the new reality in East Africa affecting populations relying on seasonal agriculture with shrinking harvests causing the cost of food to rise. Food insecurity is being caused not only by climate change but also continuing armed conflicts that lead to mass displacement and diminishing crop yields. It’s this conflict-driven food crisis which can be seen in some parts of South Sudan where the UN declared a famine in February 2017.

An overlooked conflict

The conflict in the South Kordofan and Blue Nile regions of Sudan is a largely overlooked crisis that receives little international attention in comparison to other conflicts in the region. War erupted in the two border areas during 2011 after South Sudan’s independence and continues to rage between the army of the central government in Khartoum, and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N). The SPLM-N is a Northern rebel faction that fought against the central elites responsible for the systematic marginalisation of people in the peripheries, even before the independence of Sudan.

Six years and on, the war has resulted in mass displacement internally and to neighbouring countries. The UN’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA) states that there are 230,000 internally displaced persons in the two border areas in need of humanitarian assistance. 40,000 people have sought refuge in Ethiopia from the conflict in Blue Nile, and 241,500 are refugees in South Sudan. There is speculation that the level of food insecurity in South Kordofan is likely to deteriorate from stressed to an emergency situation within a few months.

Kamil Omer, a Humanitarian Team Field Manager for a national NGO based in South Kordofan and Blue Nile says that the yield of harvest in 2016 is 35%-40 % than previous years. This is mainly caused by the ground attacks, long-range shelling and aerial bombardments that targeted productive lands last year, forcing farmers to flee without cultivating any seeds, an impact amplified by diminished rainfall.

Omer elaborates:

“At this moment, people in Kaongaro and Warni villages are in a very devastated situation; they ran out of sorghum and living mainly on grass and forestry products. They are in complete isolation from other markets as the government forces surrounding them from the Northern part and the South Sudanese rebel militias from the Southern part. Reports say that 17 persons, mostly elderly and children have died [in March/April 2017] because of lack of food.”

An anonymous source in Blue Nile revealed that stocks of sorghum are now incredibly low, resulting in dramatic inflation of the price of the staple at markets on the Ethiopian border. An ounce now costs 60 SDG, making it three times more expensive than in December 2016. He emphasises the role of insecurity in the current crisis, contrary to the international discussion which centres on drought:

“Although there is a session of hostilities since last year, but still Antonov [planes] flies over.. We do not know whom it belongs to. It didn’t drop any bombs but it seeds fear in the hearts of the people. All we know, when there is Antonov, people have to hide. People did not felt safe to plant enough crops.”

The politics of how aid is delivered

The government of Sudan is not allowing humanitarian groups to deliver aid to the border areas which are controlled by the SPLM-N rebels. In occasions of drought, people sometimes rely on cross-border markets. But because of the current insecurities in South Sudan, the cost of transportation has increased and traders have stopped bringing food items to border and refugee areas, especially in Maban, in which a South Sudanese militia known as the ‘Maban Popular Defense’ is active in terrorising refugees and traders.

Earlier in January, Donald Booth, the US special envoy to Sudan and South Sudan proposed that 100% of humanitarian aid to be delivered from government-controlled areas under the supervision of USAID, a proposal that was rejected by SPLM-N. The rebel movement insists that 20% of aid be delivered from Ethiopia through the border city of Asosa. Their rejection of the American proposal has put them under harsh criticism from the US and UK special envoys to Sudan.

Omer, the humanitarian worker from South Kordofan, supports the SPLM-N proposal, arguing that there are already experiences of government-controlled aid in Darfur. They can deliver once or twice but there are no guarantees that they will continue to deliver aid efficiently. The current food insecurity in Jebel Marrah (the Marrah Mountains), is a clear manifestation of this lack of commitment to deliver.

Activists in Blue Nile and South Kordofan call for the international community to push for delivering humanitarian aid unconditionally, and urgently, regardless of political agreement.

“We have seen aid being delivered in Syria and Libya regardless of the political deal, we wonder, why the international community have to wait for the government of Sudan to grant them access to the two areas”

Another activist added: “We need Thabo Mbeki, the head of the mediation panel (African Union High-Level Implementation Panel), to care for the people on the ground and learn about their suffering and prioritise the humanitarian access.”

‘Khartoum has no incentive to reach a peace deal with the rebels’

Omar al-Bashir, President of Sudan

A Khartoum-based human rights campaigner says that the government of Sudan has no incentive to reach a peace deal as there has been little pressure from the international community. For example, the UK is keen on trade cooperation with Sudan and a bilateral strategic dialogue on trade, migration and counter-terrorism was launched last year in Khartoum. The Obama administration lifted economic sanctions imposed on Sudan, and the head of Sudanese security services visited the US recently to meet with the CIA and FBI.

It seems that the west is becoming an ally to the regime in Khartoum, which serves US and UK economic and intelligence interests, whilst turning a blind eye to its wars and gross human rights violations, and to those suffering the brunt of conflict and drought.

All work published on Media Diversified is the intellectual property of its writers. Please do not reproduce, republish or repost any content from this site without express written permission from Media Diversified. For further information, please see our reposting guidelines.

Yosra Akasha is a Sudanese blogger and freelance writer. She is an advocate for the rights of women, refugees & displaced communities. She blogs in English/Arabic here and tweets at @sudanesedream

If you enjoyed reading this article, help us continue to provide more! Media Diversified is 100% reader-funded – you can subscribe for as little as £5 per month here or support us via Patreon here

2 thoughts on “South Kordofan and Blue Nile, the Sudanese border regions caught between drought and war

  1. How many peoples/nations live in these areas? When were the boundaries drawn? (I’m not asking about the separation of South Sudan from Sudan, but within the whole area. Were the boundaries drawn/inflicted by the European colonisers?


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.