smiling scot

by Scot Nakagawa

I ’m often asked why I’ve focused so much more on anti-black racism than on Asians over the years. Some suggest I suffer from internalized racism. That might well be true, since who doesn’t suffer from internalized racism?  I mean, even white people internalize racism. The difference is that white people’s internalized racism is against people of color, and it’s backed up by those who control societal institutions and capital. But some folk have more on their minds.  They say that focusing on black and white reinforces a false racial binary that marginalizes the experiences of non-black people of color. No argument here. But I also think that trying to mix things up by putting non-black people of color in the middle is a problem because there’s no “middle.”

So there’s most of my answer. I’m sure I do suffer from internalized racism, but I don’t think that racism is defined only in terms of black and white. I also don’t think white supremacy is a simple vertical hierarchy with whites on top, black people on the bottom, and the rest of us in the middle.

So why do I expend so much effort on lifting up the oppression of black people? Because anti-black racism is the fulcrum of white supremacy. A fulcrum is defined by Merriam-Webster as “the support about which a lever turns” or, alternatively, “one that supplies capability for action.” In other words, if you want to move something, you need a pry bar and some leverage, and what gives you leverage is the fulcrum – that thing you use so the pry bar works like a see-saw. The racial arrangement in the U.S. is ever changing.  There is no “bottom.” Different groups have more ability to affect others at different times because our roles are not fixed.  But, while there’s no bottom, there is something like a binary in that white people exist on one side of these dynamics – the side with force and intention. The way they mostly assert that force and intention is through the fulcrum of anti-black racism.

Hang in there with me for a minute and consider this. Race slavery is the historical basis of our economy. Yes, there was/is a campaign of “Indian removal” in order to capture natural resources and that certainly is part of the story. But the structure of the economy is rooted in slavery.

Our Constitution was written by slave owners. They managed to muster some pretty nice language about equality, justice, and freedom for “men” because they considered Africans less than human. Our federal system is based on a compromise intended to accommodate slavery. Our concept of ownership rights, the structure of our federal elections system, the segregated state of our society, the glut of money in politics, our conservative political culture, our criminal codes and federal penitentiaries all evolved around or were/are facilitated by anti-black racism.

And this is not just about history.  Fear of black people drives our national politics, from the fight over Jim Crow in the 50s and 60s, to Willie Horton and the Chicago Welfare Queen in the 80s, and the War on Drugs, starting in 1982 right up to the present. Since 2001, the U.S. has spent about 1.3 trillion dollars on war. Since 1982 we’ve spent over 1 trillion dollars on the drug war. About 82% of drug busts are for possession, while about 18% are for trafficking. Sound like an irrational way to wage a war on drugs? Not if it’s a war on black people. According to Human Rights Watch, black males are incarcerated at a rate more than six times that of white males resulting in one in 10 black males aged 25-29 being held in prison or jail in 2009. The same report states:

Blacks constitute 33.6 percent of drug arrests, 44 percent of persons convicted of drug felonies in state court, and 37 percent of people sent to state prison on drug charges, even though they constitute only 13 percent of the US population and blacks and whites engage in drug offenses at equivalent rates.

And why a war on people?  The war on drugs is the cornerstone of the “tough on crime” messaging campaign that is key to the Republican Southern Strategy. It suggests that extending civil rights to African-Americans resulted in the crime wave of the 1970s, (and not the baby boom as is suggested by sociologists) in order to drive white Southerners into the Republican Party. And that “tough on crime” thing, that’s not just against black people.  It’s a propaganda war that is weakening civil rights and civil liberties for all of us.

Al Sharpton

There’s no hierarchy of oppressions where race is concerned, but anti-black racism is the fulcrum of white supremacy.

All work published on Media Diversified is the intellectual property of its writers. Please do not reproduce, republish or repost any content from this site without express written permission from Media Diversified. For further information, please see our reposting guidelines.


Scot Nakagawa is a 34 year veteran in the field of social justice. Scot was the first staff person of the Coalition for Human Dignity, an organization formed to combat vigilante white supremacist hate groups in the Pacific Northwest. He has also served as Field Director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, Associate Director of the Western Prison Project (now the Partnership for Safety and Justice), educator on the staff of the Highlander Research and Education Center, and as an executive and philanthropic adviser in the field of social justice philanthropy. Scot has also been a literacy teacher, and has organized homeless shelters, and community-based food and medical assistance programs. Scot’s primary work in social change has been as a social movement analyst and organizational strategist. He is the publisher of the blog, Race Files, which addresses race and racism in U.S. politics and culture. @nakagawascot

If you enjoyed reading this article, help us continue to provide more! Media Diversified is 100% reader-funded – you can subscribe for as little as £5 per month here.

11 thoughts on “Why I, An Asian Man, Fight Anti-Black Racism

  1. I appreciate your article.

    Here in Canada, there exist many who consider the fulcrum of white supremacy to be the ongoing destruction of Indigenous people.

    Until the genocide of those who’s land we all perch and discuss our collective history blind to their ongoing struggle to survive and create Nation to Nation governance (in central Turtle Island, this would be in accordance with the historical Two Row Wampum Belt), we will not be able to address that which white supremacy and colonialists brought to these lands.

    In this article, white supremacy has succeeded in erasing whole countries of people who’s creation stories lie beneath our very feet from our sight and our conversation on race.

    Like

  2. Slavery was key economically to the country’s development using Africans because the natives knew the land and were more likely to be successful in escaping. The heavy part is the extent to which social mores developed to make such a brutal system acceptable and feasible on a day to day basis. Collateral damage: many peoples’ (cultural, not racial) roots were severed.

    Like

  3. We must fight racism, bigotry, sexism and every form of hatred where ever it appears. At the moment it lives and breeds within the American Republican Conservative movement, Im not saying that a majority of republicans are hate filled racially motivated bigots. However in today’s America, hate filled racially motivated bigots are Republicans.

    Like

  4. well said. i am a white jewish woman who does anti-racist organizing full time and i am constantly being asked by white friends to explain and defend why i put so much time and energy into anti-black racism. ironically, in between those arguments i have to argue with some black and brown people i met doing anti-racist work about their overt sexism and anti-LGBT prejudices. i am grateful that you have said in a clear and concise way what i have wasted tons of words on trying to get through to white people who don’t want to hear it. i have essentially given up and am letting go of those “friends” slowly but surely. if they can reach our age (i am 58 yrs old and talking about people in my age group) and still be so clueless/defensive about how they benefit daily from white skin privilege i guess they were never really ‘friends’ in the true sense. for the most part i don’t care but in a couple of cases, where i thought we were very close and they were very different it has been very painful.

    Like

    1. you are very welcome, glad it was of interest to you. and my ex used to say “if you know daria you know my gf” lol

      Like

Comments are closed.