A Human Zoo For The ‘Post Racial’ 21st Century

Brett Bailey and the new white supremacy

by Simon Woolley

I guess it’s one way to get international fame, lauded by liberals, and thanked by Black actors for getting some miserly short term employment.
brettbaileyinstallationBut in the real world for the vast majority of Black Britons, and other Africans on main land Europe -where this exhibition has been equally controversial- Brett Bailey’s human installation that mimics the nineteenth century Victorian ‘human zoo’, which exhibited Africans in cages, is but a modern day facet of white supremacy.

Back then the Victorians viewed Africans less than humans, and therefore put our ancestors in cages to prove it. Thousands came to ogle at the human ‘spectacle’ that fed into the European psyche that Africans had been fair game to have been enslaved or colonised, and controlled as they still were back then.

The new more subtle white supremacist such as Brett Bailey will tell Black people and anyone who will listen that he’s on our side.

Speaking about his work he said:

‘This exhibition is about humanity; about a system of dehumanization that affects everybody within society, regardless of skin colour, ethnic or cultural background, that scours the humanity from the ‘looker’ and the ‘looked at’.

You can sign the petition asking the Barbican to withdraw the exhibition here

What he didn’t say and neither did the Barbican who are exhibiting Bailey’s work, is that more than anything else his work is about power. Power then and power now. Who has it, and what they can do with it, even today, regardless of the enormous offence and humiliation it causes for many people. Furthermore, far from challenging the inferior stereotype and prejudice this exhibition has the perverse effect of perpetuating it.

Most importantly if Bailey had the decency to ask Black people here or anywhere else if we thought this work helped Black people, or continued to degrade and perpetuate an inferiority myth? I would bet that 95% of Black people would say the latter.

Whichever way Bailey slices this argument, we’re still being objectified, albeit this time in an attempt to induce horror and guilt.

I wonder if the ‘artist’ had also considered how can I, as a Black parent, take my nine year old child to see such an awful spectacle. What do I or other parents say to our children?

“It’ s okay, this Black man you see in a cage is ermm…. Well it’s art son. and I’m sure somewhere in this gallery we can find positive images of Black people.”

Truth is that Brett Bailey and the Barbican management team care not one jot about your or my feelings in regards to this. They just keep telling us that it’s art, and that he’s South African, as if that makes a difference.

racistchairThe bottom line is they do this because they can, and we have to be humiliated once again; a bit like that monstrous chair designed by Bjourne Negaard which depicts a semi naked Black mannequin on her back in a contorted position so that a wealthy owner can sit on her. In this case the wealthy owner was Darsha Zhukova, partner of the Chelsea football club owner Roman Abramovich.

Interestingly though, and just to illustrate how powerless we are until we get ourselves better organised, could you imagine Bailey or any non-Jewish person creating an art exhibition -not a museum- from the most degenerative aspects of the Holocaust using all Bailey’s  ‘reasoning’? No, of course not, and rightly so.

Sadly racism is alive and kicking. This time it’s in a world famous gallery -The Barbican – and it is masquerading as art.

There is a petition against the exhibition, I urge you to sign it. It’s the very least we can do to above all protest to the Barbican, which after all is in part a publically funded art space.
You can sign the petition asking the Barbican to withdraw the exhibition here

justintweet

This article was first published at Operation Black Vote and is republished here with the author’s permission.

_____________________________________________________

All work published on Media Diversified is the intellectual property of its writers. Please do not reproduce, republish or repost any content from this site without express written permission from Media Diversified. For further information, please see our reposting guidelines.

_____________________________________________________

Simon Woolley is the co-founder and Director of Operation Black Vote, the first comprehensive campaign to focus exclusively on the Black and minority democratic deficit. His recent achievements include leading the campaign to get Mary Seacole reinstated on the national curriculum and also helped ensure that pre-eleven history curriculum included Black and other world histories. He led the EHRC’s campaign to persuade the Home Secretary to look again at ‘Stop and Search’. Along with Black church leadership he launched the biggest BME voter registration campaign in the UK. Simon has been a visiting lecture at Nottingham University in their Social Sciences Department for the past three years. In 2012 he received a honourary Doctorate for his work in equality and human rights from the University of Westminster.  @OpBlackVote

Advertisements

2 replies

  1. So I was doing some more reading into this, and apparently The Barbican and City of London police have used something called ‘Form 696’ to halt events that ‘may threaten audience safety’. It however, after revisions of it being racially prejudice, has been used to halt ‘urban’ music events – after the form was filled in by promoters of ‘what ethinicity of people are most likely to attend’:
    (1)http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/aug/30/form-696-ehrc-discrimination-music
    (2)http://noisey.vice.com/en_uk/blog/why-did-the-city-of-london-police-can-the-just-jam-event-at-the-barbican
    The second is from an event due to happen March this year, so Form 696 is still in use and as the form states is “NOT primarily used for music events” (as it use to be).

    So the question is why isn’t it being used to halt Exhibition B? The Barbican is a venue that have required promoters to fill this out beforehand – did Bailey not need to?

    Exhibition B will no doubt again threaten audience safety AND the more delicate issue is obviously upsetting from the response of the petition, but also the mental well-being of the black actors/actresses, which must be protected.

    I think the Barbican and City of London police have been very hypocritical/in favour of a white man with no explanation.

    Side note: I haven’t had chance to watch this yet, but Noisey made a documentary about Form 696: Form 696: The Police vs. Grime (made before revisions of the form being not exclusive to music events) http://thequietus.com/articles/15402-noisey-form-696-documentary

    Like

  2. Thank you for covering this, for having the courage and wherewithal to confront and share your feelings, to the benefit of all who care. People who raise awareness and appeal to human decency are my modern-day heroes.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s