by Shane Thomas

In The Departed – the movie that finally got Martin Scorcese an Oscar – the first words spoken are from Jack Nicholson’s baleful Frank Costello: “I don’t want to be a product of my environment. I want my environment to be a product of me”, he declares in a racist opening monologue.

You may wonder what any of this has to do with Serena Williams? Well, read on…

When walking into a torrent of socialised bigotry, some arm themselves with coruscating words. Others use still defiance. In Serena’s case, she uses a tennis racquet. Ever since her father, Richard put one in her – and Venus’s – hands, each swing has been a rapier riposte to those who have a straight-line idea of what a black woman can be.

Recently speaking about the importance of black pop culture icons, Chris Rock explained that while Tom Hanks is an amazing actor, Denzel Washington is a god to his people[1]. This is partly because there is more at stake when an oppressed person does anything. They become the emissary for an entire group treated as less than human.

While discourse around how society treats Serena as an interloper is significant, that’s not what played on my mind after she won her 21st Grand Slam with victory at the All England Club last Saturday. Yes, each trophy brings disdain, regular as clockwork. It appeared again last weekend, a topic that Ahmed Olayinka Sule has already explored on this site. But, to misquote Frank Ocean; “What’s a mob to a queen?”

However, we must be mindful not to place Serena on a plinth of perfection. As journalist, Lindsay Gibbs pointed out, “…let’s remember one thing: Serena is human. She’s just far better at dealing with her humanity than the rest of us.”

Despite winning all three of the available Grand Slams in 2015, what’s curious is that Serena hasn’t operated at her best in any of them. My suspicion is that she’s increasingly cognisant of her liminal place in the game: getting a second ‘Serena Slam’; a US Open from becoming only the fourth woman to win all four Slams in a calendar year; chasing Margaret Court’s record of 24 majors[2].

From leading 5-1 in the second set, people – or me, at least – thought the Wimbledon final was over, guilty of conflating dominance with ease. Garbine Muguruza showed heart and skill to reel Serena back to 5-4. It’s important to remember that taking the attainment of success as read doesn’t make the process any easier for the one doing the attaining.

It’s in these situations when an athlete is required to think with clarity in an environment that breeds the fog of uncertainty. It’s this ability which is overlooked in the reductive and bigoted analysis where Serena is concerned. She’s not just about power, but also athleticism, poise, and mental focus, backed up by a serve that, pound-for-pound, is arguably the finest shot in the history of the sport.

Debates about the G.O.A.T will continue[3], but has there ever been a more influential tennis player than Serena? Like Jack Nicholson in The Departed, Serena has made her environment a product of her. Women’s tennis has changed irrevocably, and that’s down to the Williams family[4]. Serena is more than successful. She’s transformative.

She isn’t invincible, and will lose matches now and then. But Serena has made the woman on the other side of the net somewhat irrelevant, because she’s ascended to a higher plateau than the win/loss column.

We watch to see her compete against something bigger than a fellow tennis player. We watch to see her compete against legacy, against memory, against history. At this stage of her career, her opponent is one that is intangible and amorphous. But I’ll still back her to beat it.

[1] – As is often the case with Rock, his perspicacity is sullied with a lacquer of – as Jamilah Lemieux put it – black power being for black men.

[2] – A record I’m especially keen to see broken, given Court’s homophobic views.

[3] – Personally, I think a strong case can be made for Serena being the best ever, but not an unequivocal one.

[4] – Not just the tenor of the women’s game, but think of the increase in black players on the tour in the past few years. Especially black women.

All work published on Media Diversified is the intellectual property of its writers. Please do not reproduce, republish or repost any content from this site without express written permission from Media Diversified. For further information, please see our reposting guidelines.



A mixed-race film graduate, Shane comes from Jamaican and Mauritian parentage. He has been blogging about sport since 2010 at the website for The Greatest Events in Sporting History. He is also a contributor to ‘Simply Read’, the blogging offshoot of the podcasting network, Simply Syndicated. A lover of sport, genre-fiction, and privilege checking, Shane can be found on Twitter, both at @TGEISH and @tokenbg (and yes, the handle does mean what you think it means).

If you enjoyed reading this article, help us continue to provide more! Media Diversified is 100% reader-funded – you can subscribe for as little as £5 per month here


6 thoughts on “Serena vs. Tennis. There’s Only One Winner

  1. This is such a beautiful piece ❤

    I just want to overshare unnecessarily down here, though it would probably be better in another context. My mum has been watching Wimbledon for 40 years (since her family got a TV) and I've been watching it all my life. I remember adoring Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf, and most of all I remember the day I first saw Venus Williams on the court, blowing everyone out of the water with her skill and her style (I first saw her with loads of little white beads in her hair, looking utterly stunning.) I remember thinking it was strange that I never saw black tennis players, while there were loads of black athletes at the Olympics (the only other sport we watched in my household) and I was instantly a fan. My parents weren't keen on the Williams' game at first. They liked the fact that women's tennis was usually slower, more like the old style before lighter rackets speeded up the game. Blasting power from the baseline was what bored them about the men's contest, and they grumbled about the new era of stronger women. Of course, there was always more than a bit of misogynoir about that perennial critique, so much so that even a fifteen year old white girl could smell something off about it. I wasn't as discerning about play as my folks anyway; it was more about personalities for me, and Venus and Serena have been for all these years for me the most compelling players in the sport. Every time we see them play, every time they come to mind, they wins in our hearts, like you say, against history.


    1. And of course you have sufficient knowledge to make such an assertion?

      What do you think, readers? Are we about to get our minds blown away by this commenter? I think our “proof” is most likely, “There’s a black US President”, although let’s not rule out the “My boss is black” defence.

      Either way, I look forward to the response. I mean, after all, it’s not as if someone would try and use the comments section to try and derail an article with absolute drivel.

      Liked by 1 person

        1. No, they don’t. That’s as incorrect as saying Brazil is situated in the continent of Asia. All one has to do is pay cursory attention to society to know we don’t all start from the same place in life. I mean, this site already has a piece detailing the things Serena has to deal with that white players don’t. I even embedded it in this piece to make it really easy for you.

          Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.