by Divya Ghelani 

The Grenfell Tower deaths were a failure of listening. They demonstrate a refusal on behalf of government to hear poor communities, particularly communities of colour, and to take their concerns seriously.

I didn’t grow up in a London tower block but on a council estate in Loughborough. We were housed there in 1985, seven months after my family arrived in Britain. From the age of three I experienced broken windows, torn down fences, ‘P*kis Go Home’ written on our walls, and air rifle shots through the back door. I developed a fear of walking the streets with my mother and grandmother in case we were spat at or called names. One night, racists set fire to the tree in our garden. I grew up feeling like we lived in a paper house, as if the walls could crumple at any time. It was a place to sleep and live, but it was never home.

We followed procedure and called the police and local authorities. Policemen arrived and sipped Mum’s chai and ate her snacks. No-one one was ever arrested, and we were never rehoused. The authorities listened, but if listening never lead to action, what sort of listening was it? It was only when I was at university that my family was finally rehoused, but this was due to my father’s efforts as well as a solicitor he had enlisted and a kind woman at the Commission for Racial Equality. In the end, we received £4,000 compensation and a safe place to live, in return for fifteen years of racial abuse.

As I grew older I marched against tuition fees as a student and became one of the millions who protested against the war in Iraq. Not being heard then made me wonder if my opinion mattered at all. It is a feeling only ameliorated today by the power of social media which can circumvent government not-listening through horizontal communication on a mass level, something which proves Arundhati Roy’s point that: “There’s really no such thing as ‘voiceless’. There are only the deliberately silent, or the preferably unheard.”

For so many years my family fell into the second category, as did the residents of Grenfell Tower. The Grenfell Action Group’s website refers to fire dangers established as early as 2013. Their repeated warnings about inadequate fire safety standards – warnings backed by fire safety reports and recommendations – were ignored and ‘sat upon’ by successive governments (including by Theresa May’s current chief of staff Gavin Barwell).  Two of the women who campaigned for increased safety measures were threatened with legal action as a result, and they are now feared dead in the tower. Why, then, would the Kensington and Chelsea Tenant Management Organisation (KCTMO) ignore legitimate safety concerns?

The answer is that listening is profoundly political. Listening is mediated through social codes and relations of power. Grenfell Tower was a high-rise multicultural space whose residents tended to be poor and frequently non-white. The denigration of immigrants, and Muslims in particular, makes it easier to view such occupants as ‘making noise’ rather than exercising a political voice, a problem deepened by spending cuts in the wake of austerity politics.

Leah Bassel’s book The Politics of Listening explores listening as a sociological and political practice. Being ignored is endemic to marginalised communities and Bassel examines how better listening might create new ways of being and acting together as political equals. Political equality seems wildly utopian within the context of Brexit Britain, but the inaudibility of the poor, evidenced in the horrific story of Grenfell Tower, must be challenged if democracy in Britain is to function at all.

Better listening means journalists, politicians, landlords, GPs, hospitals, teachers and more making genuine efforts to recognise poor people as political beings with a voice, as opposed to merely tolerating them. It would require better education on citizenship and rights in schools, employing community go-betweens for people with inadequate English or those lacking the confidence to speak out. And it would mean greater parliamentary representation for marginalised communities as opposed to the current paternalistic model in which a governing elite manages whole swathes of society they have little knowledge of or connection to.

Institutional listening needs to be about political change, not platitudes, so that listening can transform itself into sprinklers and fire extinguishers, into rehousing vulnerable families, treating low-income groups and people of colour like human beings instead of as shirkers, chavs, and terrorists. As Martin Luther King put it: “Riot is the language of the unheard.” When the government refuses to listen to the justified anger of marginalised people, this becomes, particularly in times of crisis, a provocation to social unrest for, as Grenfell Tower has shown in the most grotesque way imaginable, willful ignorance is a matter of life or death.

The fee for this article was donated to the Grenfell Tower JustGiving fundraiser.

All work published on Media Diversified is the intellectual property of its writers. Please do not reproduce, republish or repost any content from this site without express written permission from Media Diversified. For further information, please see our reposting guidelines.

If you enjoyed reading this article, help us continue to provide more! Media Diversified is 100% reader-funded – you can subscribe for as little as £5 per month here or support us via Patreon here

_MG_6042Divya Ghelani holds an MA in Creative Writing from UEA and an MPhil in Literary Studies from the University of Hong Kong. She writes short stories, scripts, and is working on her debut novel which has been longlisted and shortlisted for four literary awards. Follow her @DivyaGhelani and at

One thought on “Grenfell Tower: ‘there are only the deliberately silent, or the preferably unheard’

  1. I absolutely agree about “the poor” being wilfully ignored. This applies to ALL poor, of every race and colour. The white and poor, both in UK and US have felt ignored, unlistened to, hence Trump and, to an extent, Brexit. I can understand this, though I don’t put the blame on immigrants, as some do. The blame lies with politicians. In 2017 in UK there should not be tower blocks filled with people of all ethnicity and just forgotten about/ignored. In the recent Queen’s speech we heard about the plans for HS2, for example, but nothing about re-housing residents of tower blocks into BETTER housing. That shows what politicians really care about.

    I grew up in London in my parents house, which they bought. When they came to Britain they initially lived with relatives while they got jobs and saved to move into rented accomodation. They did this, while they saved to buy a house, which they did. There was never any thought of getting help from the council, that was not how it was done then. They were never ever rich, just always “getting by” with huge mortgage payments. But they worked for everything they got. I can’t relate to living in a council house with broken windows, as described, but, of course, i know that was/is the case for many. i also did not grow up facing racial abuse, even though we lived in a neighbour-hood that was mostly white. I understood from an early age about prejudice-i could see it and hence, in teenage years I protested about the, then, National Front party who I thoroughly disagreed with. I never saw myself as a victim because I wasn’t.

    I know that it is different today. The councils today have a duty to provide decent housing for those on low income. The fact that they are not doing so and are putting people in un-safe tower blocks is shameful. Even more shameful is that they ignored warnings from those residents about the lack of safety. All the residents, regardless of race and colour. So I don’t see race and colour as the issue here. Whether an immigrant or not being poor is being poor and and that is the issue. The issue that politicians are wilfully not dealing with.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.