by Shane Thomas
Roy Hodgson, the England manager. A racist? Personally I don’t think he is.
What struck me isn’t the debate over Hodgson’s character, the vagaries of language, or the ever-present and; wearying proclamation of “political correctness gone mad!“ Rather, it was the general consensus that made Hodgson the ‘victim’ in this story. And the identity of the people leading the consensus was very pertinent. Television coverage, radio programmes, reams of newspaper coverage, all dominated by white people.
When it comes to race in Britain, particularly where football is concerned, the paradigm goes as follows: when black players have racial slurs uttered at them in foreign countries, we show outrage. Yet in this country, we’re more likely to parse racist incidents, often giving the benefit of the doubt to long-existing institutions of the sport.
While I’m not stating that English football is riddled with racism, I’m also not stating that it isn’t. You see, it’s tough to have an in-depth conversation about racism, when I don’t think many people know what racism is.
Banning people of colour from public places, violent assaults, ethnic slurs; c**ns, w*gs, n*ggers, “Go back to Africa, you stink!” Do a straw poll, and I’d expect these to be the common responses if one was asked to define racism. And while that would be a correct answer, it would also be an incomplete one.
One of the best summations of racism that I’ve encountered came from The Nation journalist, Mychal Denzel Smith. Although not a definitive definition, it’s a very useful primer.
“Ultimately, racism is a system of oppression that has disproportionately benefited those classified as “white” and regards others as second-class citizens. For a policy/thought/action/statement to be racist, it has to reinforce that second-class status.”
But what hope is there for football to address race in a nuanced and coherent manner, when the main talking point to come forth last week was the trustworthiness of the player who leaked the story? Even if the morale of the England team was damaged, how does that take precedence over racial inequality? While it’s not the sole responsibility of English football to combat racism, you can’t stand by a narrative which states that racism is no longer an issue on these shores, if you’re not prepared to do the work required.
And this work should be led by those who feel the effects of racism most acutely. Is there a genuine will in British football to create an environment that helps people of colour? Because if so, then ask them, empower them, get out of the way and let them lead the discussion.
Why are there so few black managers? Why does the issue of race only stretch to black players? Why has Britain’s Asian population barely made a dent in the footballing consciousness? Do similar inequities exist in the women’s game?
Questions like this barely scratch the surface of how racism functions, but a start has to be made. And not in a “we’ll talk about race when a controversy erupts” kind of way. But by making it as much a part of our footballing discussions as player salaries, increased levels of fitness, ticket prices, quotas of foreign players, and so on.
For clarity’s sake, institutionalised bigotry needs a lot more than a few token voices to correct past ills. Throwing a few black faces – such as Stan Collymore, Jason Roberts, John Barnes, or Hope Powell – at the problem, and expecting comprehensive reform, would be like trying to cure a bout of glandular fever by taking a couple of paracetamol tablets.
How can football move forward on race when most of the voices in the game are white? The absence of people of colour from the upcoming FA commission to investigate the English game is a case in point – an absence not lost on FA board member Heather Rabbatts.
However, rather than use this as the alpha to begin a comprehensive exchange on race in football, FA chairman, Greg Dyke immediately went on the defensive, and then (rather cynically, in my view) made his response public. This felt like him telling the woman (a woman of colour, no less) to pipe down and know her place.
A conversation on race in football will only function effectively if the disenfranchised are placed at the centre of the discussion. This may not 100% cure English football of racism, but it can plot a pathway which allows us to efficiently handle situations when racism does occur.
Journalist, Joseph Harker has posited that Britain is a country in denial when it comes to race, and after this past week, I find it tough to disagree. Because as things stand, we have a choice. Either we do the complicated and difficult work to try and remove the obstacles of racism in the game, or we accept that we’re no better than anywhere else, and stop using headlines such as these to stand on a smug – and erroneous – moral high ground.
 Some feel uncomfortable with the term “…of colour”. The reason I use it is a simple matter of self-definition. But don’t take my word for it. Take Loretta Ross’s.
 Martin Samuel has asked a similar question.
 Trudy, from the brilliant Gradient Lair blog, dissects the problems with tokenism with assistance from the equally brilliant Audre Lorde.
 By the way, can anyone explain to me what exactly Hope Powell has done to be persona non grata at the FA?
 This has since been corrected with the inclusion of Rio Ferdinand. Although, it seems little more than tokenism at work.
A mixed-race film graduate, Shane Thomas comes from Jamaican and Mauritian parentage. He has been blogging about sport since 2010 at the website for The Greatest Events in Sporting History. He is also a contributor to ‘Simply Read’, the blogging offshoot of the podcasting network, Simply Syndicated. A lover of sport, genre-fiction, and privilege checking, Shane can be found on Twitter, both at @TGEISH and @tokenbg (and yes, the handle does mean what you think it means).
- Can you name 10 black football managers? (mediadiversityuk.com)
- From Roy Hodgson to Carol Thatcher, this fixation on celebrity gaffes tells us nothing about racism | Joseph Harker (theguardian.com)
- FA board member Heather Rabbatts hits out at Greg Dyke’s all-white panel (telegraph.co.uk)
- FA supports Hodgson over ‘joke’ (bbc.co.uk)
3 thoughts on “Football vs. Responsibility”
Football is run by rich white guys, who love being in charge of football more than they love football. Genuine change, which is what’s required, would threaten their grip on the game – and the revenues. If the price that has to be paid for them to maintain their status, is that players of colour will continue to face a bit of ‘harmless’ racism, unfortunately that’s a price the white men in suits are willing to pay.
I’d like to see more people take their cue from Garth Crooks. He’s openly angry, which for me is the *only* appropriate reaction. The FA are a disgrace.
Can’t say I’ve heard much of Garth Crooks on the issue of football in race. I’ll have to check it out
Sorry, my reply got cut short. Was also going to say that there have been good things done by British football in regards to race. But the problem is – like much of British society – the people in power (who are almost always white men) don’t have the will to make football a welcoming place for all.
I agree that the marginalised being oppressed is regarded as acceptable collateral damage. It needs an entire cultural will to make it a more inclusive space.