by Shane Thomas

“There is no racism in football… If you are good, you get the job… Football is not stupid to close doors to top people.” – Jose Mourinho

“The whole recruitment process needs to be more professional, more diverse, and equality-wise, fairer. We’ve struggled to do that.” – Gordon Taylor

One shouldn’t draw any kind of equivalence from these quotes, the former made last week and the latter in September. This isn’t a, “well, they’re both good points. You can make a case for either side” situation. What they do is illustrate just where English football is on the issue of black managers in our sport – more pertinently, the lack of them.

In English football’s four divisions, there are 92 clubs. The amount of black managers at those clubs? Two.

This imbalance was set to be addressed at the last AGM of the Football League (which encompasses the 72 teams outside the Premier League). However, the organisation’s chairman, Greg Clarke failed to broach the topic, going on to decry criticism of this as, “the shrill voices of the vested interests.”

The Rooney Rule

Much talk has centred around the NFL’s, “Rooney Rule” as a panacea, which ensures that at least one person of colour must be interviewed when a head coaching position becomes available. It’s said that such a measure could offset the paucity of managers of colour in English football.
shane2More recently, Sir Trevor Brooking, the former Director of Football Development at the FA said he was against such a regulation, offering choice quotes such as, “Some black coaches say they’re not given a chance, but I do think a lot of them have to get themselves in that position”, and, “There is a reluctance from people sometimes and they feel it should be handed to them.”

While those were the incendiary statements, the most telling comment came when he said, “I’m a strong supporter of trying to invest in the right ethnic mix of players and new coaches – but they’ve got to be on merit.”

The “merit” argument. Pay close attention whenever anyone invokes this[1]. When they state it should be about the right person, no matter what race they are. Such a statement presupposes that any black people in management positions probably aren’t there on merit.

I’m yet to hear anyone advocate for people of colour to be given managerial jobs if they’re not qualified. What’s being requested are opportunities. Nothing more. It should be stated that the Rooney Rule doesn’t automatically increase the number of black managers. It just means that more will be interviewed for vacant positions.

Rooney’s Flaws

Personally, I have doubts that the Rooney Rule is workable in the context of English football. The Daily Mail’s Martin Samuel discoursed on how the threat of relegation is a complicating factor that North American sport doesn’t have to consider[2].

Also, the insular nature of football often means that hirings don’t function along the lines of recruitment in other industries. To refer to the Gordon Taylor quote above, informal communications, nods and winks, and friends of friends safeguard a closed shop environment, where only a narrow pool of men are considered[3].

This leaves men of colour throwing figurative stones at the buildings of power. And as always, we’re left waiting for the gatekeepers of the game to institute reform at their leisure. Lamenting this, The Mirror’s Oliver Holt recently said, “The Premier League won’t do anything about it, the FA won’t do anything about it, the Football League won’t do anything about it.”

So, while the Rooney Rule may not be the solution, what’s disconcerting is that those in positions of influence don’t seem to be looking for one, assuming that if we give it time, the problem will fix itself[4], while the likes of Ricky Hill and Michael Johnson are left to wait for a chance that will never come.

shane1

Not Their Problem

Let’s have this right. Jose Mourinho’s opinion is not anomalous. Though it may be asinine, it’s an accurate summation of what many people in football think. Dave Whelan and Richard Scudamore are examples of men who dissuade implementation of the Rooney Rule, and yet offer no viable alternative.

The fact that no committee has been set up to look at the issue, the fact that no legislation has occurred to ameliorate this inequity, the fact that – as Yasin Bangee wrote – you would struggle to name ten black football managers, the fact that the absence of Britain’s Asian population goes unmentioned, and the fact that people of colour never get to lead the discussion is testament that a problem in football only counts as a problem when it concerns white men.

For clarity’s sake, I don’t think English football’s powerbrokers are actively trying to hinder men of colour from management positions. That’s because they don’t have to. The structure of our society does that for them.

UPDATE: The Football League announced yesterday they will review the matter next month. A PR move? Possibly. But it’s a start. Let’s hope it leads to something substantial.

[1] – In any industry. Not just in football.
[2] – While the article has a pungent stench of paternalistic whiteness, it does make some salient points.
[3] – Roxane Gay once judiciously stated; “It’s not that people of color are deliberately excluded but that they are not included because most communities, literary or otherwise, are largely insular and populated by people who know the people they know.”
[4] – When has that tactic ever worked in progressing social change?

_________________________________________________________________________

TWOWEEKSNOTICE “Two Weeks Notice” is Shane Thomas’s bi-monthly column encompassing. Pop culture to sport, and back again

A mixed-race film graduate, Shane comes from Jamaican and Mauritian parentage. He has been blogging about sport since 2010 at the website for The Greatest Events in Sporting History. He is also a contributor to ‘Simply Read’, the blogging offshoot of the podcasting network, Simply Syndicated. A lover of sport, genre-fiction, and privilege checking, Shane can be found on Twitter, both at @TGEISH and @tokenbg (and yes, the handle does mean what you think it means).

Advertisements

6 thoughts on ““There is no racism in football… If you are good, you get the job”

  1. I was gutted with Mourinho for what he said. And anyone making the ‘merit’ argument wants to ask themselves how there’s so many white managers who are blatantly utter numpties but who get chance after chance at club after club.

    Like

    1. Lots of potential nuances in why, but I think the fundamental thing it comes down to is that – in any industry – nobody thinks it odd when a lot of white, cisgender, male faces are the ones in positions of influence. Racism dictates that white = normal

      Like

  2. You say that Trevor brooking or indeed any such statement that brings up the merit argument presupposes that any black person in management is not there on merit.
    This is a ridiculous sweeping statement. If someone was in a management position, regardless of colour, religion, sexuality, gender etc then they’re presumed good enough.
    As a Liverpool fan, if I were told that a black manager would guarantee us a league title I’d be shouting for him to get the job. I’m sure any football fan would want that manager.
    The reality is that managers should be hired on merit. Presuming that people are racist for saying this does nothing for your arguments.

    Like

    1. Yes, I do say it presupposes that. Because that statement only ever comes up when a disenfranchised group of people complain about being locked out of the corridors of power. The same statement came up when the Rooney Rule was first proposed in America. I also heard it when there was talk of having a PoC or female lead in ‘Doctor Who’.

      Odd that it only ever arises in these circumstances. Because when has anyone ever said a job should be given to someone unqualified? If I was demanding a job managing in English football, then it would be fair to bring up the merit argument, as I’m not up to the job. But I’m not.

      I’m sure fans of every club would be happy with a PoC manager if he won them trophies. But the thing is, we seem unlikely to find out if that’ll ever be the case, because they’re not even being considered.

      Like

    1. If we went by that rationale, how do you account for the amount of PoC players in this country? That number’s closer to 20%. As I said in the piece, it’s about equitable opportunities for all – the key word being opportunities.

      Most Poc struggle to even get interviews, while a man who’s partaken in racism, sexism and homophobia (Malky Mackay) has had 2 jobs over a 5 year career, and was on the verge of getting a third until the Daily Mail broke the story about his bigoted behaviour.

      And your comment makes no mention of the East Asian and South Asian population in this country. People seem to omit them from this analysis, but they live here too.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s