by Maya Goodfellow 

On Wednesday, political journalist for Channel 4 News Michael Crick decided to share on Twitter an excerpt from a conversation he supposedly had with a London cabbie: “You couldn’t vote for that Corbyn, could you?  Not for anyone that’s messed around with that Diane Abbott.” Crick’s choice to cherry-pick this specific quote and make it public spoke volumes.  Diane Abbott, Britain’s first black female MP who continues to be one of the country’s foremost women politicians, doesn’t deserve any respect. In fact, her place is as the butt of a joke.

I’ve written about the way Abbott’s been treated before but Crick’s tweet deserves a specific explanation. In this instance, Abbott isn’t taken seriously because she’s a woman and because she’s black. It helps that she’s also a politician who, it seems, are assumed as fair game. But the point where gender and race meet is of the utmost significance here.

Way back when European colonisers first interacted with people on the African continent, images of overtly sexual, supposedly unfeminine and crude black women were commonplace. These dehumanising stereotypes have endured. When they’re not entirely written out of the picture, women of colour, and specifically black women, have their bodies held up for all in society to gaze upon. Black women in the public eye can expect to be both lusted after and reviled at the same time.  Michelle Obama is a prime example. Recently degraded and masculinised in a racist cartoon where she was compared with feminised Melania Trump, the message was because she was black she isn’t a real woman. But at other times she’s lauded as an “exotic” fashion icon. These are stereotypes chosen at will, whatever fits the prevailing narrative. This is the sentiment at the heart of Crick’s tweet: it is intriguing that Jeremy Corbyn, a white man, had a relationship with a black woman, but it’s also wrong to the point that it can be used to discredit him as a politician.


To say Crick was out of line is an understatement. He shouldn’t have tweeted such a vile comment, which was merely intended to humiliate its subject and hold her up for ridicule after rumours circulated last year and were reported in the Telegraph for no good reason I can glean. So far he has stayed silent on the issue; it’s a silence that’s galling. He should have had the courtesy to apologise, or at the very least the sense of shame to delete it. Instead it remains on his Twitter as a sign of what’s acceptable in British politics: women – and more specifically women of colour – can be reduced to nothing more than their alleged sexual history.

Pinning all of this on Crick would be a mistake. His willingness to openly share misogyny with no hint of disapproval for the cabbie who apparently uttered these words means he’s part of the problem. But he isn’t the problem.  His behaviour is the product of an insidious cocktail of racism and sexism that lurks in the background of British politics and goes beyond an almost obsessive focus on women’s appearance and sexual history. Take Labour MP Dawn Butler’s candid words on racism. In February, she revealed that in the confined space of the Members Only lift in the Commons, a fellow MP failed to realise she too was an elected member or Parliament and informed her “This lift really isn’t for cleaners.” Now it might help you to understand such a statement if you know that Butler is black. By virtue of her skin colour and gender, the unnamed MP thought she wasn’t an elected official but a member of the service staff. It’s hardly a surprising assumption; women of colour are more likely to be in low-paid jobs than they are a Member of Parliament. That won’t shift by just promoting more women to positions of power but in part changing the way journalists like Michael Crick think it appropriate to report on women (of colour) in politics.

Diane Abbott isn’t the only politician to have abuse thrown at her but the consistency with which insults flow is astounding, as is the intensity of dislike. Crick was reflecting and getting a kick out of the underlying idea that as a black woman who dares speak her mind Abbott needs to be put back in her box. That can be done through any means possible: humiliation, insults or a microscopic analysis reserved for minority ethnic female politicians who are implicitly told they represent all women of colour. This is the background that makes Crick’s 123 characters so damaging. Women of colour are human beings, not crude stereotypes for journalists and public to admire or disparage depending on how they feel. That shouldn’t need to be said but sadly the current state of our politics still makes it necessary.

All work published on Media Diversified is the intellectual property of its writers. Please do not reproduce, republish or repost any content from this site without express written permission from Media Diversified. For further information, please see our reposting guidelines.

Maya Goodfellow is a journalist and political commentator. She primarily writes about British politics and has worked as a researcher for a think tank. She also writes about international affairs, with a particular focus on conflict studies. Find her on Twitter: @Mayagoodfellow

If you enjoyed reading this article, help us continue to provide more! Media Diversified is 100% reader-funded – you can subscribe for as little as £5 per month here

23 thoughts on “Michael Crick’s Diane Abbott tweet is unacceptable but it isn’t particularly surprising

      1. Not about her race; it’s about her incompetency. What you are asking for is the use of kid gloves and the race card. If you have equality, you have to take criticism too.


  1. The pervert Corbyn used to feed Abbott laxatives and insist she shit on his face. Abbott is an inbred, retarded, ugly, racist nigger whore.


  2. We live in a society that says it’s okay for White men to attack and degrade Black women. All women experience sexism and are not treated equally, but Black women experience more prejudice and are treated even more unequally. They are the least respected and this is brushed under the carpet.


    1. “We live in a society that says it’s okay for White men to attack and degrade Black women” ,
      -Really? And where do you live? Saudi arabia?


  3. I know a person who worked with her who says she’s difficult and divisive, in person. So while the famous “fuck off” might be understandable, it’s just shameful how her public perception from the white middle classes is still so often awful and racist like this Crick tweet. She’s surely one of the most brilliant political figures of her generation, and a great debater and interviewee as well..


  4. Diane Abbott clearly gets lots of hate directed towards her, especially on Twitter. This is because she is perceived as being an idiot with political power and influence. Nothing to do with race or gender, although I understand that this simplistic reactionary canard is a safe comfortable blanket, and saves having to actually consider why such a huge number of people have problems with her but not with other black people nor women.


      1. Inasmuch as *anyone* on Twitter is immune from trolling, and it’s a sad fact that there will usually be a racial element where a different ethnicity is involved, ditto for gender/disability/sexual preference. Hell, why call someone a ‘prat’, when you can call them a ‘little prat’, even if they’re of average height? Anyone who is anyone on Twitter gets trolled, but many have the ability/cojones to deflect/weather criticism, or just block en masse like Owen Jones. Abbott is practically in a class of her own, however the likes of Goodfellow might prefer otherwise.


  5. I don’t know much about her, but enjoyed reading your critique therefore will read up more on Abbott and what is happening. Thanks for this post.


  6. Many of Abbott’s critics do so out of ignorance, envy and sexism. Some of us and the media complain that politicians are too robotic and controlled by the centre. Abbott has been that consistent rare exception and gets pilloried for her independent thinking. Yet we forget that Abbott’s was a terrific member of the Treasury Select Committee back in the 1990s. So effective that when Brown became chancellor he and his team made sure Abbott was not re-elected to that committee.
    Where was Crick’s journalist hat at the that moment in the cab? Crick’s reaction just implies that he endorses the driver’s comments and thus the smears against Abbott by the Mail.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Come on, no one needs Black or Woman as an excuse to attack Abbot. She’s a media whore (& yes SJWs that term is used for men too) who loves the sound of her own voice. An imbicile & hypocrite (seriously have you heard her speak, especially next to articulate well reasoned people – check out “This Week” for e.g. next to Michael Portillo she sounds like an uneducated klutz- no, not a fan of portillo either)

    She is an intellectual miget par excellence. Ppl just want her to shut up & go away because she’s so irritating & mostly wrong about so many subjects she talks on.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.