by Abdullah Shihipar 

This past Feburary, I was having dinner with my brother and some of his friends in Boston. As we were waiting for our food and making conversation, the topic soon turned to the ongoing presidential elections. The New Hampshire primary had just concluded and Donald Trump had resoundingly defeated his opponents. Amongst those voting against him in the Republican primaries were my brother’s friends — despite being Democrats, they chose to cast their ballot in the Republican primary to “keep Trump out”. This might seem like an odd thing to admit, yet alone do, until you consider the fact that everybody at the table was Muslim.

Months later, Donald Trump is now the presumptive Republican nominee and people of colour are anxiously wondering what the next few months hold in store for them. Across the aisle, in the Democratic Party, a heated battle is being waged between supporters of Senator Bernie Sanders and former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. As both sides trade barbs online, the POC identity is being utilized as a defense. Clinton supporters feverishly argue that Sanders is losing the votes of people of colour, while Sanders backers respond that Bernie is the better candidate for people of colour. After all, he never called black youth “super predators” and has taken a strong stance against pursuing a militaristic foreign policy.

From the outset, this looks promising; both sides are talking about the issues that affect different racialized groups. However, one movement, known as the #BernieorBust movement, has given me pause. This group of Bernie supporters, who are mainly (but not always) white, argue that in essence Trump is exactly like Clinton – so therefore voting for Clinton would make no difference. This premise is quite dangerous and frankly, blatantly false.

Proponents of this movement argue that while Trump has used racist rhetoric, he has never pursued an imperialist foreign policy. Clinton would be dropping bombs on racialized people abroad, so therefore, she would be the more harmful pick. This type of argument ignores the power which hate speech carries. Already, we have seen people of colour abused at Trump rallies and Trump supporters vitrolically attacking people online. If Trump has called for a ban on Muslim immigration, if he has called Mexicans rapists and drug dealers and says he will deport immigrants – there’s no reason to think he won’t act on it. He lacks experience purely because he hasn’t held office, but what he lacks in experience, he makes up for with an army of hate-filled supporters. To ignore this is dangerous.

Movements like #BernieorBust are focused on propelling an individual into power through the ballot box. But sympathetic politicians rarely instigate change. It helps to have a friendly ear, of course, but real change is driven by people power. It takes years of organizing and pressure to get politicians to listen. Even Bernie’s own campaign is a reflection of this, lacking coverage on the issues pertaining people of colour – Black Lives Matter activists and others pushed the campaign to provide answers. Since then, his campaign has prominently featured topics like racial justice, Islamophobia and immigration as a priority.

So if change is driven through people power, voting for the lesser evil makes sense. This way, organizers and activists can concentrate on existing problems instead of having to tackle any problems a Trump presidency may introduce. Proponents of the #BernieorBust movement brush away concerns about a Trump presidency, arguing that Clinton is the weaker candidate anyway and that once again, Trump and Clinton are essentially the same thing. These supporters seem so focused on their goal of getting a president elected, that they ignore what the actual organizing dynamics and conditions for people of colour would be under a Trump presidency. Organizing for change here takes a backseat to organizing for a candidate.

If people of colour who are worried about Trump are having their concerns dismissed during the election, there is no reason to believe that these #BernieorBust supporters will stand with them should Trump get elected. They are willing to let him get there in the first place.

This is not to say that Bernie Sanders is sanctioning this, or that all of his supporters espouse this attitude. Bernie is the better candidate; he has pushed the DNC to the left, and he should fight to the last minute. Clinton, on the other hand, has a history of supporting an aggressive military-based foreign policy and backing domestic policies that have wreaked havoc on Black and Latino communities. But she is not Donald Trump.

Donald Trump is not just another David Cameron or a Marco Rubio. He is a fascist who openly welcomes the support of white supremacists. People are free to vote how they want and certainly do not have an obligation to vote to keep Trump out. However, employing arguments that a Trump presidency wouldn’t be any more harmful for POC while doing so is dishonest. A Trump presidency would be disastrous for us; some of us are able to vote on principle, some of us have to vote for survival, while some of us cannot vote at all. Voter suppression laws and other tools of disenfranchisement disproportionately affect people of color, specifically African-Americans.

The ballot box is not the end of the road. There is a lot of work to do after the campaign banners come down and stump speeches end. But this November, voters will be faced with a decision that may dramatically alter how people of colour are treated in the United States. Either we stick with the status quo and work to break that down, or we move backwards. Only time will tell what choice that is.

As a brown Muslim who has family in the United States – I hope and pray it’s the former.

All work published on Media Diversified is the intellectual property of its writers. Please do not reproduce, republish or repost any content from this site without express written permission from Media Diversified. For further information, please see our reposting guidelines.

Abdullah Shihipar is a writer and organizer based in the Greater Toronto area. He frequently writes about issues pertaining to race, equity and social justice. You can find out more at his website,, or follow him on Twitter @AShihipar.

If you enjoyed reading this article, help us continue to provide more! Media Diversified is 100% reader-funded – you can subscribe for as little as £5 per month here


3 thoughts on “Why the #BernieorBust movement is failing Americans of colour

  1. I don’t know that it is accurate to say #BernieOrBust is “mainly (but not always) white”. Is there polling data on the subject, and if so why is it not mentioned or linked in the piece?

    Anecdotally, many of the #NeverHillary people I’ve encountered online are not white. In fact, the closest thing the movement has to a spokesperson is YahNe Ndgo, a black woman whose appearance on CNN galvanized many fed up with the smug condescension of Clinton supporters. Here is the video:

    Personally I will be voting for the Democratic nominee in the fall to keep Trump out of office. But I can’t blame those who feel their conscience won’t allow them to vote for the “lesser evil”, especially those among them who feel their voices have been erased by elites clinging to the “only angry young white men support Bernie” narrative.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. As your sorts have placed yourself against America, what bad for your kinds is most likely good for America. Hence, I’m supporting Trump and doing so more because of how you all hate him than out of any love for- or trust in him.


  3. Your thesis is reasonable but misses the point. First of all, there is a substantial fraction of #BernieOr Bust support from the PoC communities. Second, it’s purpose is revolution, not incremental change. No one, brown or white, will be better off with Trump, but, Clinton will simply continue the corporatist, bellicose, and frankly racist policies of the current government.

    #BernieOrBust is about structural change, something that adjusting parameters of the current system cannot do. I would refer you to Roberto Mangebeira Unger’s “Obama must be defeated” campaign of the last election cycle. He reasons that as long as the Democrats are in power, real change cannot happen. #BernieOrBust is a way of “rebuilding the ship while at sea”.

    If Sanders manages to get into the White House, that’s the best outcome, and we can start the realignment of government and give closet progressives in the congress the freedom to act. If not, we will set the stage for a full-force midterm revolt by the #BernieOrBust base and everyone else who will be ready for it.

    Trump is a scary prospect, and it is not what I want to see, but, Clinton is scarier because frankly, I don’t have the time to wait for her to run out her privilege on my back.


Leave a Reply to Ya'akov Cancel reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.